×

*Scripture verses covered in this section's commentary are noted in italics

Luke 5:36-39 meaning

Verses covered in this passage:

  • Luke 5:36
  • Luke 5:37
  • Luke 5:38
  • Luke 5:39

Jesus shares two parables about the incompatibility between the old patterns of righteousness as taught by the Pharisees, and the new way of life that He has come to offer.

The parallel Gospel accounts for Luke 5:36-39 are Matthew 9:16-17 and Mark 2:21-22.

Jesus continues His response to the Pharisees’ issue concerning the behavior of His disciples with a pair of parables.

Previously the Pharisees had challenged Him:

“The disciples of John often fast and offer prayers, the disciples of the Pharisees also do the same, but Yours eat and drink.”
(Luke 5:33)

Jesus initially responded with a short parable explaining to them that the reason His disciples do not fast and offer prayers as the followers of the Pharisees and John the Baptizer do is because they are with the bridegroom—which calls for celebration and feasting (Luke 5:34-35).

That parable answered their question. But now Jesus elaborates with two more parables which describe the potency of His mission.

The first parable uses the metaphor of clothing. The second parable uses the metaphor of wineskins.

Jesus’s first parable is, “No one tears a piece of cloth from a new garment and puts it on an old garment; otherwise he will both tear the new, and the piece from the new will not match the old” (v 36).

Cloth was an expensive commodity in the ancient world. Clothing and garments were labor intensive and time-consuming to make. It was a far more efficient use of time and resources to repair an old garment that had a tear than it was to buy or make a new one. But in the process of patching tears in an old garment, one had to make sure they were using the proper patch of material.

Because cloth shrinks over time, especially after the first few times it gets washed, the garment-mender needed to use a patch of cloth that had already been shrunken to patch up a tear. If he or she used a new patch of cloth that was unshrunk, then the patch would shrink after being washed and pull away from the seams of the garment and a worse tear would result.

Jesus means by this parable that He, His teachings, and His kingdom are like a patch of unshrunk cloth. The traditions (like fasting) that the Pharisees have built up around the Law are like an old garment that is tearing apart. Jesus did not come to repair this old garment. He is not interested in joining the old system of righteousness based on external rule-following that is riddled with tears of hypocrisy. He came to provide inner and external harmony between God and man.

Jesus did not come to mend here and there. He came to make all things new (Revelation 21:5). Taking His teaching as a patch to the old system would only make its tears worse. These old ways do not adequately reflect living the goodness of Christ. Therefore they need to be replaced.

Jesus said He came to fulfill the Law and the Prophets (Matthew 5:17). A new approach is required for that to take place. If one is to accept Jesus’s teachings, and rule in His kingdom, he must set aside his old garments of righteousness measured by religious practice and put on the new robes of Christ’s righteousness measured by loving others (Matthew 7:12, 22:11-14; Revelation 3:5). It will not work to use some of Jesus’s teachings to patch up a person’s righteousness. He must embrace the whole of who Christ is and what He commands.

Moreover, our hearts and minds are like old garments. Applying a new patch of unshrunk cloth of Jesus’s teaching will not mend their tears. It will make them worse. We need to be given entirely new hearts (Psalm 51:10) and new minds (Romans 12:2) that Christ offers us every day.

Jesus’s second parable is:

“And no one puts new wine into old wineskins; otherwise the new wine will burst the skins and it will be spilled out, and the skins will be ruined. But new wine must be put into fresh wineskins” (v 37-38).

The pattern of Jesus’s second parable is similar to His first one. In the same way that no one puts a patch of unshrunk cloth on an old garment, neither do people put new wine into old wineskins. This is because new, unfermented wine will expand and burst the inflexible old wineskins. The result is that the new wine spills and is wasted and the old wineskin is ruined. New wine must be put into fresh wineskins, if both are to be preserved.

The meanings of the two parables are very similar. The new wine is Jesus and the kingdom life He offers. The old wine (though unmentioned) is the self-righteous hypocrisy based on legalism as promoted by the Pharisees. What Paul will call the “righteousness of faith” versus the “righteousness of the law” (Romans 9:30-33). The fresh wineskins are disciples whose hearts and minds are ready to follow Jesus and His teachings. The old wineskins are those seeking to manufacture righteousness by externally following the Law and the traditions built up around the Law.

One of the main points of both parables is that Jesus, His teachings of righteousness, and His kingdom are incompatible with the tired, worn-out, stale way of life that the Pharisees imposed. This incompatibility is seen in another contentious moment between Jesus and the religious establishment in Matthew:

“Then some Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem and said, ‘Why do Your disciples break the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat bread.’ And He answered and said to them, ‘Why do you yourselves transgress the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition?’”
(Matthew 15:1-3)

Just as no one can serve two masters (Matthew 6:24), the new wine of Christ cannot be put into the old wineskins of religious practice. Either we continue to be old wineskins that hold the tasteless, legalistic, and hypocritical wine of self-seeking, or we become new and fresh wineskins in Christ that are filled with the vibrant wine of His righteousness as expressed in serving others. We will not experience the righteousness of Christ or His kingdom if we remain an old wineskin. We must be made new. To receive the new wine of Christ, we must become fresh wineskins.

Jesus concludes His second parable with a final observation and/or prediction,

“And no one, after drinking old wine wishes for new; for he says, ‘The old is good enough’” (v 39).

Jesus’s remark goes against conventional thinking. Traditionally, old, or aged, wine is regarded as better and more highly valued than new wine. But Jesus is saying that the new wine is better.

The new wine is Jesus’s teachings and the new way of kingdom life He offers. If this verse is to be understood in context, then it seems that a person holding on to the old ways of legalism and manufactured righteousness through the Law is not likely to readily accept the new wine Jesus is offering. If we believe we are in the right, it is very difficult to lower our pride and realize we might actually be in the wrong. Like the darkness that is unable to comprehend the light (John 1:5), so too are these old wine guzzlers who are unable to comprehend the fullness of grace, mercy, and abundant life which Jesus offers. They incorrectly and foolishly insist that what they have is good enough. So, they never even give the new wine of Jesus a try.

But anyone who stops drinking the old wine and sets their old cup of wine down and actually tries the new wine of Jesus would instantly “taste and see that the LORD is good” (Psalm 34:8). They would never again be satisfied with the old wine and think that it is good enough. Like the living water Jesus offered the Samaritan woman at the well, no one who has tasted the new wine of Jesus “will thirst again” (John 4:13).

The first miracle Jesus performed was literally turning water into new wine (John 2:1-11). It was a physical manifestation of this teaching. When He did this, the head waiter marveled how much better Jesus’s new wine was. He said:

“Every man serves the good wine first, and when the people have drunk freely, then he serves the poorer wine; but you have kept the good wine until now.”
(John 2:10)

Jesus’s teachings bore themselves out in the lives of the Pharisees. We are told of at least two Pharisees who tried the new wine Jesus came to offer. One was Nicodemus, who visited Jesus at night (John 3:1-21). Because of his acceptance, Nicodemus was publicly admonished and ridiculed by his fellow Pharisees (John 7:50-52). The other was Joseph of Arimathea (who may have been a Sadducee). Joseph sat on the Sanhedrin Council and was waiting for the kingdom of God (Luke 23:50-51—see also John 19:38).

Jesus’s offer of new wine is available and freely offered to us. But we cannot enjoy it if we are drinking the wine of our old ways. No matter what we think of our old (current) ways—whether it is good enough or sour—Jesus’s ways are infinitely better.

“O taste and see that the LORD is good!”
(Psalm 34:8)

Biblical Text

36 And He was also telling them a parable: “No one tears a piece of cloth from a new garment and puts it on an old garment; otherwise he will both tear the new, and the piece from the new will not match the old. 37 And no one puts new wine into old wineskins; otherwise the new wine will burst the skins and it will be spilled out, and the skins will be ruined. 38 But new wine must be put into fresh wineskins. 39 And no one, after drinking old wine wishes for new; for he says, ‘The old is good enough.’”




Check out our other commentaries:

  • Romans 16:6-8 meaning

    Paul continues listing believers who have served Christ well. He wants the Roman believers to greet them. Likely these believers would be primary allies to......
  • Deuteronomy 25:1–3 meaning

    Moses instructs the Israelites on how to administer legal justice in the land. This law limits the number of lashes to be given to a......
  • Hebrews 2:5-8 meaning

    God appointed man, not angels, to rule over the earth. Man has failed to rule over the earth because he fell into sin through Adam.......
  • Ruth 3:6-9 meaning

    Ruth does exactly as Naomi told her.......
  • Romans 1:26-27 meaning

    God’s design for sex is between a man and a woman within marriage. When we decide we know better than God, we exchange what is......