Judges 1:30-36 concludes the first phase of the incomplete conquest of Canaan and the coexistence of Israelites and Canaanites.

Zebulun did not drive out the inhabitants of Kitron, or the inhabitants of Nahalol; so the Canaanites lived among them and became subject to forced labor” (v 30).

The tribe of Zebulun, situated in the northern part of Israel , fails to expel the inhabitants of Kitron and Nahalol. Instead, they subject the remaining Canaanites to forced labor. This arrangement mirrors the situations of the other tribes and signifies a failure to fully obey God's command to eliminate the Canaanite presence, which will eventually lead to their downfall.

Asher falls into the same sin concerning their allotted territory: Asher did not drive out the inhabitants of Acco, or the inhabitants of Sidon, or of Ahlab, or of Achzib, Helbah, Aphik, or of Rehob (v 31). The tribe of Asher, located along the northern coast , also fails to expel the Canaanites from several key cities. Acco and Sidon, in particular, are significant coastal cities with strong Canaanite influence.

The Asherites’ inability to drive out the inhabitants results in them, as with the other tribes, living among the Canaanites: So the Asherites lived among the Canaanites, the inhabitants of the land; for they did not drive them out (v 32).

The cycle continues with Naphtali: Naphtali did not drive out the inhabitants of Beth-shemesh, or the inhabitants of Beth-anath, but lived among the Canaanites, the inhabitants of the land; and the inhabitants of Beth-shemesh and Beth-anath became forced labor for them (v 33).

The story remains painfully the same as the entire tribe of Naphtali, in the northern region, fails to expel the inhabitants of Beth-shemesh and Beth-anath. Like Zebulun and many of the other tribes, Naphtali subjects the Canaanites to forced labor, maintaining a semblance of control but allowing the Canaanite presence to persist.

The last three verses describe the plight of the tribe of Dan : Then the Amorites forced the sons of Dan into the hill country, for they did not allow them to come down to the valley (v 34). Dan faces significant resistance from the Amorites, who force them into the hill country and prevent them from settling in the more fertile valleys.

Yet the Amorites persisted in living on Mount Heres, in Aijalon and Shaalbim; but when the power of the house of Joseph grew strong, they became forced labor” (v 35).

Despite their initial resistance, the Amorites remain in certain areas, but the growing strength of the house of Joseph (the half-tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh), Dan’s neighbor to the north, eventually subjugates the Amorites to forced labor. Israel is gradually asserting control, but it is incomplete and delayed. Ultimately, their actions, or lack thereof, disobeyed God’s initial command to the Israelites in Deuteronomy 7.

The final verse in Judges 1 describes the large Amorite territory, The border of the Amorites ran from the ascent of Akrabbim, from Sela and upward (v 36). The ascent of Akrabbim (the ascent of the “Scorpion”) is thought to be a mountain ridge south of the Dead Sea. This means the Amorites’ territory stretched all the way down to the land allotment of the tribe of Judah.

The decision to subject the Canaanites to forced labor instead of fully driving them out reflects a compromise that would have long-term implications for the spiritual and cultural integrity of the Israelite community.

In the early chapters of Judges, the various tribes of Israel are highlighted for their divergent successes in driving out the Canaanites, which brings to light not only their victories but also their failures. The passage illustrates how the tribe of Dan, in particular, resorts to compromise rather than complete obedience to God’s commands. The significant theme throughout this historical narrative is the ongoing struggle between divine directives and human choices, encapsulating the broader cycle of apostasy that characterizes the period of the judges.

When examining Judges 1:30, we observe the consequences of this compromise in faith and action; instead of total conquest and separation from the Canaanite influences, the Danites allowed the Canaanites to reside among them. This decision reflects a broader trend among the tribes, as their incomplete obedience sets the stage for future struggles with idolatry and moral decay. Such patterns serve as a warning of the spiritual peril of half-hearted faith and underscore the importance of fully embracing God's covenant, as highlighted in the Tough Topics on obedience and idolatry.