Add a bookmarkAdd and edit notesShare this commentary

Matthew 13:24-30 meaning

Matthew records Jesus’ second parable concerning the kingdom of heaven. He compares it to a man who sows good wheat in his field, but later an enemy sows toxic, unproductive tares.

This parable is unparalleled in the other gospel accounts, although in Mark 4:26-30Jesus tells what may be a simplified version of this parable.

Matthew continues this chapter with another parable (the second of seven) concerning the kingdom of heaven that Jesus presented. The first was "the parable of the sower" (Matthew 13:3-9.) Jesus compared a believer's heart as it received the word to four different types of soils where seeds were sown (Matthew 13:18-23.) The parable Jesus presented in this passage is known as "the parable of the wheat and the tares." The them who Jesus presented this parable to is the crowds (Matthew 13:34). Because Jesus explains the meaning of this parable to His disciples in Matthew 13:37-43, we will only focus on the parable's literal elements here. We will focus on the explanation in the later passage that covers Jesus's explanation.

Jesus began the parable, saying the kingdom of heaven may be compared to a man who sowed good seed in his field (v 24). This tells us that this parable teaches us something about the kingdom of heaven. Like "the parable of the sower," "the parable of the wheat and the tares" is agricultural. In it, Jesus describes a farmer who sowed good seed in his field (v 24). The farmer sowed wheat seeds in expectation that in time they would sprout, grow, and at harvest they would produce grain that he could either eat or sell for profit.

But the farmer has an enemy who came at night while the farmer's workers were sleeping and sowed tares among the wheat and went away (v 25). Tares are a type of weed that strongly resembles wheat during its sprouting phase, but lacks fruit. This becomes evident during harvest. The tares that Jesus describes could be the weed we call today "darnel." Even though they look like wheat for a time, tares do not produce good grain. Instead, they produce a toxic grain that can cause illness or even death if consumed.

After the farmer's enemy secretly sowed tares among the wheat and went away (v 25), time passed. The tares unknowingly grew alongside the wheat. But the farmer's workers noticed that when the wheat sprouted, that the tares became evident to them (v 26). These servants of the landowning farmer came and reported to him about the tares. They said to him, Sir did you not [only] sow good seed in your field? (v 27). How then, they asked, does it now have tares in it? (v 27).

And the farmer said to his workers, An enemy has done this! (v 28).

His servants then asked their master what he wished them to do? Do you want us, to go cut and gather all the tares in your field? (v 28). In other words, do you want us to go pluck out all the tares?

The farmer replied, No, for while you gather up the tares, you may uproot the wheat with them (v 29). The reason the farmer said this to them was because it might be too difficult for his men to discern the difference between the wheat and the tares while the plants are young. Or perhaps too difficult to tear out one without also tearing out the other. Not only would his workers remove the bad tares, they also would remove the good wheat in the attempt to rid the landowner's field of tares. If this happened, then the farmer would lose the good of his harvest.

Instead, the farmer instructed his workers, to allow both the wheat and tares to grow alongside each other until the time of the harvest is ready (v 30). At which point, the farmer will say to the reapers, first, remove and gather up the bad tares and bind them in bundles to be burned (v 30). The tares are burned because they have no good use and may even be toxic. After the tares are removed, the workers can then gather the good wheat into my barn (v 30), where the farmer can store it for later consumption or sell it for profit.

Jesus's parable of the wheat and the tares has some similarities to the vision that the Lord gave the prophet Jeremiah just before Judah's final destruction and exile to Babylon (Jeremiah 24:1-10). In Jeremiah's vision, the division is not between good wheat and bad tares, but between good and bad figs. The good figs are in one basket and the bad figs are in another (Jeremiah 24:2-4). The good figs will be carried away to Babylon for a time where they will prosper and grow in their love for God (Jeremiah 24:5-7). The bad figs will remain in Judah and face utter destruction as they abandon God (Jeremiah 24:8-10). Jeremiah's vision of the good and bad figs occurred as he prophesied. In both Jeremiah's vision and Jesus's parable there is a distinction between good and bad, God is the one who makes this distinction, and there are different outcomes for each group.

Jesus later provides the explanation of this parable in Matthew 13:36-43.

Select Language
AaSelect font sizeDark ModeSet to dark mode
This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalized content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.