These verses illustrate a decisive transition from the tragedy of the crucifixion to the expectation of what lies beyond the sealed tomb.
As we reach the aftermath of the crucifixion, When evening had already come, because it was the preparation day, that is, the day before the Sabbath (v. 42) introduces us to a pivotal point in the Gospel narrative. The mention of “preparation day” reminds readers of Jewish customs: the day before the Sabbath was when people made all necessary arrangements so they would not work on the holy day. Evening here likely refers to the time shortly before sundown, marking the end of a solemn day in which Jesus was crucified. The Gospel writer underscores the urgency of handling Jesus’s body properly before the Sabbath began.
This context emphasizes the deep reverence for Jewish law, even in a moment of profound sorrow. It sets the stage for honorable men and women to step forward to ensure the burial of the Lord was carried out according to custom. The respect for divine commandments, even in times of crisis, parallels other Biblical accounts where faithfulness to God's directives is maintained (see references to honoring the Sabbath in Exodus 20Exodus 20 commentary). Through this, Mark highlights the intersection of cultural diligence and the gravity of Jesus’s death.
Next, Joseph of Arimathea came, a prominent member of the Council, who himself was waiting for the kingdom of God; and he gathered up courage and went in before Pilate, and asked for the body of Jesus (v. 43). Joseph of Arimathea’s hometown is believed to have been located in Judea, but points of precise geography have been debated for centuries. Regardless, Joseph emerges as a significant figure willing to take a bold stand. Historically, he would have been alive in the early first century AD, around 30 AD when these events took place. As a notable member of the Jewish Council (the Sanhedrin) and someone expectant of God’s reign, Joseph’s actions show faith and compassion.
His request for the body of Jesus is courageous, because aligning himself with the crucified Messiah risked his reputation among fellow Council members. By going directly to Pilate, Joseph also steps onto the stage of local governance under Roman rule. Pilate, who served as prefect of Judea from AD 26 to 36, holds the authority to grant or deny this burial request. Joseph’s initiative foreshadows how followers of Christ often must act in faith, even when facing resistance.
Mark continues, Pilate wondered if He was dead by this time, and summoning the centurion, he questioned him as to whether He was already dead (v. 44). Pilate's surprise emphasizes how quickly Jesus had died; often crucifixion could linger for days. The Roman centurion, having witnessed the events at the cross, was responsible for confirming death. This consultation reaffirms the historical authenticity of the account: official confirmation ensures no confusion about Jesus’s fate.
From a governance perspective, Pilate’s inquiry reflects the procedural norm of the Roman legal system. He did not simply take Joseph’s word for it. Verification by a Roman military officer added weight, thoroughly confirming that Jesus had physically died before the body was released. This step would later become crucial when discussing the reality of Christ’s resurrection and dispelling claims that He might not have died.
Then, ascertaining this from the centurion, he granted the body to Joseph (v. 45) depicts Pilate’s final approval. Such permission illuminates Pilate’s willingness to let Joseph of Arimathea offer a respectful burial. This was a departure from the typical disgraceful treatment of crucifixion victims, who were sometimes left unburied or cast into common graves. Instead, Pilate’s decision allowed a dignified interment.
The public acknowledgment that Jesus was indeed dead underscores the reliability of the gospel account. Joseph’s request, Pilate’s verification, and the centurion’s confirmation leave no doubt that the crucifixion resulted in an actual death. Even in an official capacity, Rome conceded to the reality of Jesus’s demise.
Following that, Joseph bought a linen cloth, took Him down, wrapped Him in the linen cloth and laid Him in a tomb which had been hewn out in the rock; and he rolled a stone against the entrance of the tomb (v. 46) provides a poignant portrait of reverence. The act of buying a linen cloth and personally wrapping the body of Jesus conveys deep devotion. Tombs carved from rock were expensive and often reserved for those with financial means, indicating Joseph’s willingness to offer what he had for the Lord.
Such care clearly shows that Joseph wanted to protect Jesus’s body from defilement or desecration. Rolling the stone across the entrance sealed the tomb, preventing animals or grave robbers from entering. This image sets the stage for the resurrection narrative. Despite the careful closure and secure sealing, the tomb would not hold Christ indefinitely (see Mark 16:1-6Mark 16:1-6 commentary for the subsequent resurrection account), an indication that divine power would surpass earthly precautions.
Finally, Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of Joses were looking on to see where He was laid (v. 47) highlights the faithful watchfulness of these women. Mary Magdalene, so named because she hailed from Magdala on the western coast of the Sea of Galilee, was a devoted follower of Jesus. She would become the first to witness the risen Christ. Mary the mother of Joses is also mentioned as a consistent presence among the women close to Jesus, openly grieving and caring for Him. Their eyewitness account lends further credibility to the story of Jesus’s burial, tying into the many women who played pivotal roles in the life and ministry of Christ.
Their observation of the tomb’s location readies the narrative for the next significant event. Because they knew precisely where Jesus was placed, their testimony would be crucial when He rose. These verses capture the heartbreak of the burial while pointing forward to hope. Faithful disciples, especially these women, did not abandon Jesus during His death but remained watchful and prepared for what might come next.
Set to dark mode
Mark 15:42-47 meaning
As we reach the aftermath of the crucifixion, When evening had already come, because it was the preparation day, that is, the day before the Sabbath (v. 42) introduces us to a pivotal point in the Gospel narrative. The mention of “preparation day” reminds readers of Jewish customs: the day before the Sabbath was when people made all necessary arrangements so they would not work on the holy day. Evening here likely refers to the time shortly before sundown, marking the end of a solemn day in which Jesus was crucified. The Gospel writer underscores the urgency of handling Jesus’s body properly before the Sabbath began.
This context emphasizes the deep reverence for Jewish law, even in a moment of profound sorrow. It sets the stage for honorable men and women to step forward to ensure the burial of the Lord was carried out according to custom. The respect for divine commandments, even in times of crisis, parallels other Biblical accounts where faithfulness to God's directives is maintained (see references to honoring the Sabbath in Exodus 20Exodus 20 commentary). Through this, Mark highlights the intersection of cultural diligence and the gravity of Jesus’s death.
Next, Joseph of Arimathea came, a prominent member of the Council, who himself was waiting for the kingdom of God; and he gathered up courage and went in before Pilate, and asked for the body of Jesus (v. 43). Joseph of Arimathea’s hometown is believed to have been located in Judea, but points of precise geography have been debated for centuries. Regardless, Joseph emerges as a significant figure willing to take a bold stand. Historically, he would have been alive in the early first century AD, around 30 AD when these events took place. As a notable member of the Jewish Council (the Sanhedrin) and someone expectant of God’s reign, Joseph’s actions show faith and compassion.
His request for the body of Jesus is courageous, because aligning himself with the crucified Messiah risked his reputation among fellow Council members. By going directly to Pilate, Joseph also steps onto the stage of local governance under Roman rule. Pilate, who served as prefect of Judea from AD 26 to 36, holds the authority to grant or deny this burial request. Joseph’s initiative foreshadows how followers of Christ often must act in faith, even when facing resistance.
Mark continues, Pilate wondered if He was dead by this time, and summoning the centurion, he questioned him as to whether He was already dead (v. 44). Pilate's surprise emphasizes how quickly Jesus had died; often crucifixion could linger for days. The Roman centurion, having witnessed the events at the cross, was responsible for confirming death. This consultation reaffirms the historical authenticity of the account: official confirmation ensures no confusion about Jesus’s fate.
From a governance perspective, Pilate’s inquiry reflects the procedural norm of the Roman legal system. He did not simply take Joseph’s word for it. Verification by a Roman military officer added weight, thoroughly confirming that Jesus had physically died before the body was released. This step would later become crucial when discussing the reality of Christ’s resurrection and dispelling claims that He might not have died.
Then, ascertaining this from the centurion, he granted the body to Joseph (v. 45) depicts Pilate’s final approval. Such permission illuminates Pilate’s willingness to let Joseph of Arimathea offer a respectful burial. This was a departure from the typical disgraceful treatment of crucifixion victims, who were sometimes left unburied or cast into common graves. Instead, Pilate’s decision allowed a dignified interment.
The public acknowledgment that Jesus was indeed dead underscores the reliability of the gospel account. Joseph’s request, Pilate’s verification, and the centurion’s confirmation leave no doubt that the crucifixion resulted in an actual death. Even in an official capacity, Rome conceded to the reality of Jesus’s demise.
Following that, Joseph bought a linen cloth, took Him down, wrapped Him in the linen cloth and laid Him in a tomb which had been hewn out in the rock; and he rolled a stone against the entrance of the tomb (v. 46) provides a poignant portrait of reverence. The act of buying a linen cloth and personally wrapping the body of Jesus conveys deep devotion. Tombs carved from rock were expensive and often reserved for those with financial means, indicating Joseph’s willingness to offer what he had for the Lord.
Such care clearly shows that Joseph wanted to protect Jesus’s body from defilement or desecration. Rolling the stone across the entrance sealed the tomb, preventing animals or grave robbers from entering. This image sets the stage for the resurrection narrative. Despite the careful closure and secure sealing, the tomb would not hold Christ indefinitely (see Mark 16:1-6Mark 16:1-6 commentary for the subsequent resurrection account), an indication that divine power would surpass earthly precautions.
Finally, Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of Joses were looking on to see where He was laid (v. 47) highlights the faithful watchfulness of these women. Mary Magdalene, so named because she hailed from Magdala on the western coast of the Sea of Galilee, was a devoted follower of Jesus. She would become the first to witness the risen Christ. Mary the mother of Joses is also mentioned as a consistent presence among the women close to Jesus, openly grieving and caring for Him. Their eyewitness account lends further credibility to the story of Jesus’s burial, tying into the many women who played pivotal roles in the life and ministry of Christ.
Their observation of the tomb’s location readies the narrative for the next significant event. Because they knew precisely where Jesus was placed, their testimony would be crucial when He rose. These verses capture the heartbreak of the burial while pointing forward to hope. Faithful disciples, especially these women, did not abandon Jesus during His death but remained watchful and prepared for what might come next.