Select Language
AaSelect font size
Set to dark mode
AaSelect font size
Set to dark mode
This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalized content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
Matthew 25:42-45 meaning
This parable has no apparent parallel in the other gospel accounts.
TheBibleSays commentary has subdivided the parable of the Sheep and the Goats and its subsequent elaboration (Matthew 25:31-46) according to the outline below. To better facilitate continuity and cohesion, the entire passage of this teaching is included in the Biblical text at the bottom and its words are italicized throughout these portions of commentary even if they do not appear in this specific portion of scripture.
This portion of the commentary focuses on Matthew 25:41-45—"The Life Choices of the Accursed."
Matthew 25:31—46 The Context of the Parable
Matthew 25:31 The Opening Remark
Matthew 25:32—33 The First Judgment: Sorting the Sheep from the Goats
Matthew 25:34 The Second Judgment: The Reward of the Righteous
Matthew 25:35—40 The Life Choices of the Righteous
Matthew 25:41 The Third Judgment: The Banishment of the Accursed
Matthew 25:42—45 The Life Choices of the Accursed
Matthew 25:46 The Closing Remark
THE LIFE CHOICES OF THE ACCURSED
The King will say to the goats on His left: "For I was hungry, and you gave Me nothing to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me nothing to drink; I was a stranger, and you did not invite Me in; naked, and you did not clothe Me; sick, and in prison, and you did not visit Me."
First the King separated the believers (sheep) from the unbelievers (goats) as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. This was the first of three judgments described in this passage on the Parable of the Sheep and the Goats.
And then the King judged the believers (the sheep on His right) and rewarded them for their good works. And He explained to them what their good works were. They sacrificially served people to meet their most basic needs. These humble acts of love deeply touched the King and were highly praised (blessed) of His Father.
To the extent that they loved people, they loved the King (The way we follow the first commandment of Loving God, is to follow His second, which is to love others—Matthew 22:37-40). And they were compensated with a kingdom prepared for them in the New Heaven and the New Earth. This was the second judgment described in this passage of the Sheep and the Goats and it focused on the rewards given to the sheep.
And then the King judged the unbelievers (the goats on His left) for their lack of good works. He banished them to the eternal fire prepared (not for them) but for the Devil and his angels. This began the third and final judgment described in this passage on the Sheep and the Goats, which is the judgment of the goats.
Just as the King explained to the righteous sheep about their good works, the King also explained to the accursed goats about their lack of good works.
This third judgment, describing the Son of Man's evaluation of unbeliever's deeds, aligns with what other scriptures say will happen when the Son of Man returns:
After telling the accursed goats to "Depart into the eternal fire," the King will say to those on His left and recount how they were disobedient in their life.
He will say: "for I was hungry, and you gave Me nothing to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me nothing to drink; I was a stranger, and you did not invite Me in; naked, and you did not clothe Me; sick, and in prison, and you did not visit Me."
These actions that the unrighteous (goats) did not do are the same six actions that the righteous (sheep) did do. As mentioned in the Matthew 25:35-40 commentary about the life choices of the righteous, all six actions address deeply human needs: food, drink; shelter; clothing; health; and friendship. The listing of six human needs is symbolic of humanity, as six is a number that often represents man in scripture.
But instead of giving the King something to eat when He was hungry or visiting Him in prison as the sheep had done, these goats did nothing.
And just as the righteous sheep were puzzled and questioned the King when did they ever served Him, so too are the accursed goats bewildered and question the King when had they passed an opportunity to serve Him.
Then they themselves also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not take care of You?'
It is worth noting that the accursed goats who made themselves God's enemies will acknowledge in this moment that He is "Lord" (Philippians 2:10-11).
The King's reply to the goats is likewise similar to what He told His sheep.
Then He will answer them, 'Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.'
Again, the phrase, to the extent, indicates a matter of degree and shows how this is an evaluation of the goats' deeds. (Just as it was when the King previously evaluated the sheep's deeds). God does not consider the extent of our works in regards to whether or not a person has received the gift of eternal life. A person either believed in Jesus and has received the gift of eternal life or a person has not believed in Jesus and has not received the gift of eternal life. This simple faith and the receiving of eternal life by pure grace is completely binary. There is no "to the extent" about it. The extent of deeds determines the degree of rewards.
The outcome of the unbelieving goats' judgment is categorically bad. And the entire range of outcomes within this category range from bad to worse. There is no good that the goats will receive at this judgment. They all are banished into the eternal fire. No good awaits them there. Though it appears it will be worse for some than others based on the extent to which unbelievers did not love and serve people—including the least of these. Even not serving one may make it worse.
The King's evaluation of the unbelievers' (goats) works reveals at least three things.
First, the King's evaluation reveals how every choice that every individual matters exponentially more than we tend to realize. This includes the choices of unbelievers. The way unbelievers treat people matters a great deal to the King. And whether they realize it or not, at their judgment it will matter a great deal to them as well. But at that point it will be too late for them to make better choices.
The works of unbelievers do not qualify or disqualify them from being in God's family—only God's grace can make us sons and brothers of the King. And God's gift of eternal life is received through faith in Jesus Christ alone and has nothing to do with our works (John 3:16; Ephesians 2:8-9). Receiving Jesus Christ is to receive His sacrifice, accomplished for us, apart from our efforts.
This depiction of God's judgment of the goats' works serves as a reminder that disobedience to God in all its forms stores up wrath in our day of judgment (Romans 2:5-6).
Second, the King's evaluation of unbelievers' deeds reveals that it is not only things done that matter to God (whether good or bad). Also things undone (whether good or bad) also matter to Him. These goats were not rebuked for what they did. They were rebuked for what they left undone. They saw people in need but did not act.
Both these goats and the desperate people they saw were made in God's image. The moral image of God within the goats should have been sufficient for them to act with mercy and compassion upon their fellow image bearers. The goats and the afflicted they ignored share a common humanity and dignity through their common Creator. And yet the goats did not provide food or drink, or invite, clothe, tend, or visit their fellow humans in their time of suffering. For not doing what they ought to have done, the goats will be judged.
The Bible teaches that everyone will be held accountable for what they choose not to do.
Solomon reminds us, "Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due, when it is in your power to do it" (Proverbs 3:27) and, "Do not say to your neighbor, 'Go, and come back,
and tomorrow I will give it,' when you have it with you" (Proverbs 3:28).
And James teaches: "Therefore, to one who knows the right thing to do and does not do it, to him it is sin" (James 4:17).
As does the Apostle John:
"But whoever has the world's goods, and sees his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in him? Little children, let us not love with word or with tongue, but in deed and truth.
(1 John 3:17-18)
The third thing the King's reply reveals is that ignorance does not excuse sin. The fact that the goats did not know that they were serving the King if they served the King's brothers does not get them off the hook. The King never disputed their ignorance. He disputed their disobedience.
It is in our nature to sin. People frequently sin and fail to perceive their offense to God. Even believers who have God's Spirit habitually sin. John tells the readers of his first epistle, that if we say we have no sin we deceive ourselves (1 John 1:8). But if confess the sins that we are aware of, Jesus does not hold them against us, and He cleanses us of all unrighteousness which includes the sins we don't know of and therefore are unable to confess (1 John 1:9). David prays in the Psalms for God to forgive even his hidden faults (Psalm 19:12).
God will judge everyone perfectly. He knows everything about every internal and external factor of the temptations we encounter. And just as the Master entrusted his wealth to each slave "according to his ability" in the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:15, one of the first trio of parables in this chapter), God will consider a person's external and internal circumstances, capabilities, and opportunities in His judgment of every individual (Hebrews 4:12). And He will do so with perfect justice as only God can do. But disobedience is disobedience. And sin is sin, regardless whether we consider it is wrong. We will be judged and held accountable for everything we chose to do as well as everything we chose not to do.