Select Language
AaSelect font size
Set to dark mode
AaSelect font size
Set to dark mode
This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalized content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
Matthew 26:45-50 meaning
The parallel gospel accounts of this event are found in Mark 14:41-46, Luke 22:47-48 and John 18:2-9.
For a complete listing of the broken rules see Jesus's Trial: Part 1. The Laws Broken by the Religious Leaders.
Matthew continues his narrative of Jesus's final night before His crucifixion.
Jesus's arrest and Judas's betrayal of his Rabbi in the Garden of Gethsemane most likely took place on the night of Nisan 15 (sometime after midnight on Friday by Roman reckoning).
See "Timeline of Jesus's Final Day" to learn more about the timing and sequencing of this event.
For the past few hours Jesus had been fervently praying (Luke 22:44) in the Garden of Gethsemane ("the olive press") to His Father, asking God "If it is possible, let this cup pass from Me" (Matthew 26:39). Shortly after they arrived at Gethsemane, He asked His disciples to "sit here while I go over there and pray" (Matthew 26:36). He also asked them to "pray that you may not enter into temptation" (Luke 22:40).
Jesus then took Peter, James, and John further into the garden and confided to them how deeply troubled He was, and asked them to keep watch (Matthew 26:37-38). Jesus then went a little further ("about a stone's throw") to pray (Luke 22:41). Jesus returned to His disciples twice, only to find them sleeping both times (Matthew 26:40-41, 43). Both times He woke them up and exhorted them to pray (Mark 14:40). Jesus went back to praying again (Matthew 26:44).
It appears that three things occur as the events of this passage unfold. Matthew, Mark, and Luke mention two of them. John mentions the other. The three events are:
1. JESUS AWAKENS HIS DISCIPLES TO LET THEM KNOW THE HOUR HAS COME
2. JESUS ADDRESSES THE LARGE CROWD (John 18:4-8)
3. JUDAS IDENTIFIES AND BETRAYS JESUS WITH A KISS
It is unclear which of these events took place second or third. The commentary for this section will use these events in the order listed above as an outline to unfold what happened.
Before we continue, it is worth pointing out a few things about Judas Iscariot.
Jesus had numerous disciples, but He selected twelve to be among His closest apprentices and He commissioned them with special authority (Matthew 10:1).
Judas Iscariot was one of the twelve (Matthew 10:4). The name Judas Iscariot means "Judah of Kerioth." Kerioth was a town located in the far south of Judea, approximately 25 miles south of Jerusalem and 10 miles west of the Dead Sea. Judas had the distinction of being the only disciple from Judea, the southern part of Israel. The other eleven were from the north, the Galilee region (see map).
The Gospel of John indicates that Jesus spent His first year in Judea, with little known fruit from His efforts. It could be that Judas was His first and only disciple (from the twelve) from that year of effort. As the one who would betray Him, that would make complete Judea's rejection of Jesus.
Moreover, in Hebrew, Judas's actual name was "Judah," just as Zacharias's actual name was "Zachariah." The Hellenization of these Jewish names can cause us to miss some prophetic connections. Judah, the patriarch of the tribe of Judah (the tribe of the Jews) prefigured Judah from Kerioth (Judas Iscariot). In Genesis, Judah betrayed his brother Joseph. (Joseph serves as a type of the Suffering Servant Messiah predicted in the Old Testament (Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12), while King David is a type of the Conquering Messiah.)
Judah plotted to kill Joseph. He put Joseph in the ground for 3 days and then sold him for shekels of silver (Genesis 37:26-28). Later Judah of Genesis repented of his betrayal (Genesis 43:8-9, 44:18-34). So would "Judah Iscariot" (Matthew 27:3).
Jesus is of the lineage of King David, who is descended from the tribe of Judah (Matthew 1:2, 6, 16). Judah also serves as a type of the Messiah, as he offered himself as a ransom for his brother Benjamin. This event foreshadows Jesus, who gave His life as a ransom for the world (Genesis 44:33-34, 1 Timothy 2:5-6).
Then He came to the disciples a third time. Again, they were sleeping. Jesus woke them up and said to them: "Are you still sleeping and resting?" (vs 45). There appears to be a note of disappointment in Jesus's rhetorical question (the question presumes an answer of "Yes"). He is chastising the disciples because they were still sleeping when they should have been praying.
But instead of asking His disciples to pray, Jesus announced the hour is at hand (vs 45). From Luke's account it appears as though Jesus was in the middle of asking them to pray again when His enemies appeared (Luke 22:46). But "while He was still speaking, behold, a crowd came" to arrest Him (Luke 22:47).
When Jesus saw this, He said: "Behold, the hour is at hand."
And when He said this, He was announcing that the moment He had long been preparing for had finally come.
The hour refers to the moment for Jesus to fulfill the Messianic mission of His first advent to earth. It was the hour for Him to suffer and die for the sins of the world (Isaiah 53, Matthew 20:28, John 1:29, 3:17).
This was the same terrible hour Jesus was referring to when He told the disciples:
"Now My soul has become troubled; and what shall I say, 'Father, save Me from this hour'? But for this purpose I came to this hour."
(John 12:27-28)
As the Messiah, this hour was the defining moment of Jesus's first coming.
Jesus had been mindful of this hour throughout His ministry:
Jesus was keenly aware of His assigned destiny as this hour approached:
(Matthew 26:18, John 12:23-28, 13:1).
(Matthew 10:38, 16:21, 17:12, 17:22-23, 20:17-19).
(Matthew 26:21, 26:31-32, 26:41, John 13:33, 14:1-3, 14:18-19, 14:27-29, 16:1, 16:4-7, 16:12, 16:16-22, 16:32-33).
But now His hour had come.
So, Jesus awoke His disciples and told them: Behold, the hour is at hand.
After making this significant announcement, Jesus continued with a startling remark: and the Son of Man is being betrayed into the hands of sinners (vs 45).
The phrase, the Son of Man, was a Messianic title and reference from Daniel (Daniel 7:13-14).
To learn more about the meaning of this title, see our article on "The Son of Man."
Jesus had previously identified Himself as the Son of Man to the disciples (Matthew 16:13, 15-17, 16:27-28). And Jesus had previously told them that as the Son of Man, that He would be betrayed into the hands of men to be killed (Matthew 17:22-23). Earlier that night, during the Passover Seder, Jesus had identified Judas, His disciple, as the one who would betray Him (Matthew 26:21-25). However, it appears as if none of the disciples suspected or fully perceived that it would be Judas until now.
The expression, the Son of Man is being betrayed into the hands of sinners is an expression meaning that the Messiah would be handed over to the Gentiles (who are pagans, and sinners). This was foretold in the prophetic twenty second psalm,
"For dogs have surrounded me;
A band of evildoers has encompassed me;
They pierced my hands and my feet."
(Psalm 22:16)
"Dogs" was a derogatory expression that Jews commonly used to describe Gentiles. Ultimately, Jesus would be handed over to the Roman authorities, who were Gentiles, to be crucified. Crucifixion entailed nailing His hands and feet to a cross. One modern understanding of the cruelty of crucifixion is that the person hanging on the cross would eventually become so exhausted they could no longer raise themselves up by their nailed-feet and hands to breathe, and would die of suffocation. Each time they raised themselves up to take a breath, they would have to put their body weight on their wounded hands and feet.
But ironically, the generic term sinners, which Jesus used to refer to Gentiles, also included the Jewish religious establishment (Pharisees and Sadducees) along with the Gentile 'dogs.' The Jewish religious leaders abused their power to exploit those they were to serve (Matthew 21:13, 23:2-33). Their self-righteousness was hypocritical, hollow, and evil (Matthew 4:7, 5:20, 16:6).
The armed force that had come to arrest Him came from the chief priests (Sadducees) and elders of the people (Pharisees) (vs 47). This force also included a Roman cohort (John 18:3). A Roman cohort consisted of 100 troops. If a complete Roman cohort came with Judas and priests' servants, then this was a very large crowd indeed.
After startling the disciples awake with this disquieting news that He was being betrayed into the hands of sinners, Jesus said: "Get up, let us be going, behold, the one who betrays Me is at hand!"" (vs 46).
The one who betrays me is a reference to Judas Iscariot, the disciple who betrayed Jesus to the chief priests for thirty pieces of silver (the price of a slave) (Matthew 26:14-16, Exodus 31:22). This payment constituted a bribe, which meant that the prosecution against Jesus was illegal [Rule 4: Bribery]. This will be one of many illegalities they will commit in their passion to eliminate Jesus as a perceived threat to their political position.
Jesus might either have seen Judas when He said this or simply recognized what was happening.
Jesus's remark—Get up, let us be going—suggests that the disciples were not fully awake until they were surrounded. It also seems as though Jesus was trying to find a way to accomplish the Father's will through His prayer (Matthew 26:39). But once Jesus recognized there was no other possible way, He accepted this dreadful circumstance as His Father's will (Matthew 26:39) and He submitted to arrest.
While He was still speaking, behold, Judas, one of the twelve, came up accompanied by a large crowd with swords and clubs, who came from the chief priests and elders of the people (vs 47).
The second phase of Jesus's prosecution—His arrest—had begun.
To learn more about the five stages of Jesus's religious condemnation see "Jesus's Trial, Part 3. The 5 Stages of Jesus's Trial."
While Jesus was still saying these things and waking up His disciples, Judas Iscariot, one of the twelve disciples came to Gethsemane. Judas was not alone.
From the disciples' perspective, this was likely a shocking and disturbing turn of events. We can tell from the fact that they fell asleep that they didn't seem particularly anxious on that evening. Even though Jesus had told them many times that he would be betrayed, none of them seemingly believed that it would happen, or that it would be arranged by the trusted disciple who kept the money box—Judas (John 13:29).
The disciples did not appear to know what was happening even when Jesus dismissed Judas at the Seder meal, saying "What you do, do quickly" (John 13:28-29). Judas's betrayal completely took them by surprise. This was likely why Matthew included the word, behold, in his narrative—for dramatic effect. Matthew quoted Jesus as saying behold twice already in the previous two verses (vs 45, 46). Saying—behold—three times in so short a span emphasizes how traumatic this hour was for the disciples as they were startled from their slumber.
Accompanying Judas was a large crowd, armed with swords and clubs. John reports they also had torches and lanterns and that a Roman cohort accompanied him (John 18:3). If this was a full Roman cohort, then it meant anywhere from one hundred to six hundred soldiers. Estimates of the total crowd range from as large as a hundred to several hundred men.
John tells us that Judas "knew the place" where Jesus would be, because Jesus had often met in the garden of Gethsemane with His disciples during His time in Jerusalem (John 18:3).
This armed crowd came from the chief priests (Sadducees—the temple overseers) and elders of the people (Pharisees—the leaders of the community synagogues). Mark adds they also came from "the scribes" (the religious lawyers) (Mark 14:43). These three groups were the same groups that Jesus told His disciples would cause Him to suffer and who would kill Him, before He came back to life on the third day (Matthew 16:21).
The reason the large crowd came was to arrest and seize Jesus. Matthew and Mark (Mark 14:43) both say that the crowd came from the chief priests and elders of the people. This indicates the chief priests and elders were orchestrating Jesus's arrest. The armed crowd came from them. Luke includes the significant detail that some of the crowd included "chief priests and officers of the temple and the elders" themselves (Luke 22:52). The priests and elders who came likely did so to oversee and manage Jesus's arrest to ensure that nothing went wrong and to act quickly if things went sideways.
Both the orchestration and presence of the chief priests and elders are significant because according to the Jewish cultural laws and oral traditions (later written down around 200 B.C. in the Mishnah), it was forbidden for the judges of the Jewish council (the Sanhedrin) to participate in an arrest of someone they were to later judge. The Sanhedrin had to remain neutral in all trials they judged [Rule 2: Neutrality]. If the chief priests and elders orchestrated, oversaw, or participated in some other way in the arrest of someone they tried, they could not be deemed neutral judges.
Therefore, according to their own rules, the chief priests and elders of the people legally disqualified themselves as Jesus's judge by their orchestration, their commissioning of the proxy crowds they sent, and their managing presence at His arrest.
Their involvement in His arrest includes two other violations of Jewish law. It reveals their conspiracy to murder Jesus [Rule 1: Conspiracy] (Matthew 26:2-3, 26:14-16). And it strongly suggests that the verdict was predetermined and that the trial was rigged against Him [Rule 3: Rigged].
The presence of a Roman Cohort meant that a high level official or officials in the Sanhedrin requested its force, which would have to be granted from Pilate. Such a request would have required Caiaphas's authorization. This also may explain why Pilate was awake and already in court so early in the morning (John 18:28). Pilate may have already known about the arrest and anticipated that the Jews were going to bring Jesus to him for execution.
The Roman Cohort's presence also reveals the extreme level of fear that the religious leaders had concerning Jesus. They urgently needed to arrest Him that night. We can infer that Jesus's identification of Judas as His betrayer a few hours earlier set off alarms that their evil conspiracy to kill the Man many in Israel hoped was the Messiah could be made public. Such an exposure could be disastrous for them on many levels, not the least of which was their removal of power by the people or Rome. So, it appears that they took no chances and mustered the largest force they could summon.
Two additional reasons the Roman cohort may have been summoned were fear of Jesus's power and His disciples' loyalty. They were prepared for either Jesus and/or His disciples to fight. It is likely that Judas had been part of discussions about their commitment to apply armed resistance when the time came (Mark 14:31).
The Pharisees and Sadducees also may have feared Jesus's miraculous powers. They had heard about His mighty acts and even witnessed some of them. Even though Jesus had never used His miraculous powers for violence against anyone, in their minds a large force may be necessary to compete with such capability.
Judas may have also made the chief priest and elders aware of the disciples' fierce loyalty to Jesus and their willingness to fight and die for Him. The religious authorities may have felt that an insurmountable show of force in the form of a Roman cohort would be sufficient to prevent any attack, or more than sufficient to subdue a skirmish should things turn violent.
Recall, how just a few hours earlier the disciples had all promised that they were ready to fight and die for Jesus (Matthew 26:35). As one of the twelve, Judas would have known how the other disciples felt about Jesus and how committed they were to Him. The eleven from the Galilee in the north were from an area near the center of influence by the Jewish Zealots, a party committed to an armed revolt against Rome. They all exhibited the basic attitude of the Zealots. One was apparently a "card-carrying member" of the Zealots (Simon the Zealot, Luke 6:15). And they carried the weapon of a Zealot, a small sword (Luke 22:49).
If the disciples were able to fight their way out and secure Jesus's escape, then it would be a disaster for the chief priests and elders. It could possibly result in a Jewish civil war, which Rome would likely seek to end by removing them from power. And the resulting Roman oppression would be even more severe than the present.
This fear was already in the religious leaders' hearts (Matthew 22:46, John 11:48). This was their opportunity (Matthew 26:3-5). And the priests and elders were going to take no chances that Jesus's disciples would ruin it by letting Him escape. The Sadducees and Pharisees wanted to ensure nothing went wrong.
For a brief moment it seemed their precautions of sending a large armed crowd was validated when Peter began attacking them as soon as he was alert enough to see what was going on (Luke 22:49-50, John 18:10). But, in accordance to His Father's will, Jesus freely submitted to their illegal arrest.
(It is unclear whether Judas identified and betrayed Jesus with a kiss before or after Jesus addressed the crowd and displayed His divine power.)
According to John's Gospel, it appears that when the large crowd first came, Jesus, "knowing all things that were coming upon Him, went forth and said to them 'Whom do you seek?'" (John 18:4).
"They answered Him, 'Jesus the Nazarene'"
(John 18:5a).
When they said "Jesus the Nazarene" they were referring to Jesus's legal name according to their human customs. Jesus was raised in the small town of Nazareth (Matthew 2:23, Mark 1:9, Luke 4:16, John 1:45) They were speaking to Him as though He were a subject beneath their authority and no more.
Then Jesus, replied, "I am He" (John 18:5b).
To our modern eyes this seems like a direct and simple response to their question. It was. But it was also much more than that. It was also a claim to be the LORD, God. The name the LORD used of Himself when He spoke to Moses at the burning bush was "I AM WHO I AM" (Exodus 3:14). This was likely a word play on the name, Yahweh—the term translated as LORD.
When Jesus replied, "I am He," He was both answering their question truthfully (He was Jesus of Nazareth)—AND—He was claiming to be the LORD God. John's Gospel underscores this divine claim with the following observation:
"So when He said to them, 'I am He,' He projected the power of God and they drew back and fell to the ground" (John 18:6). Many translations italicize "He" indicating that it is implied rather than spoken. This would infer that Jesus answered the question the same way God answered Moses at the burning bush, saying "I Am" (Exodus 3:14). The Hebrew covenant name for God is "Yahweh" which means "the One who exists." Jesus, the essence and author of existence, is proclaiming to His creation His reality (Colossians 1:16-17). His creation, being evil, did not recognize Him (John 1:5).
The impact of Jesus saying "I Am" was a remarkable display of power, possibly designed to shock the large crowd to their senses that they were arresting no mere man. It was a sign that they were trying to seize God Himself.
After giving them a moment to recover and possibly reconsider their purpose, Jesus asked them again, "Who do you seek?" (John 18:7). They remained blind to their folly and again replied, "Jesus the Nazarene" (John 18:7).
This time Jesus answered them without the display of divine power. "I told you that I am He, so if you seek Me, let these go their way" (John 18:8).
By freely submitting to arrest, Jesus was not only following His Father's will (Matthew 26:39), He also was negotiating the release of His disciples, who would go onto spread the good news of God's kingdom, the forgiveness of sins, and eternal life across the earth after Jesus returned to life (Acts 1:8). And as John points out their release was "to fulfill the word which [Jesus] spoke, 'Of those whom You have given Me I lost not one'" (John 18:9, apparently referencing John 10:28-29).
(It is unclear whether Judas identified and betrayed Jesus with a kiss before or after Jesus addressed the crowd and displayed His divine power.)
At this point "after coming" (Mark 14:45), Judas immediately came forward from among the crowd to identify Jesus (Luke 22:47).
Matthew next says Now he who was betraying Him gave them a sign, saying, "Whomever I kiss, He is the one; seize Him" (vs 48). Matthew introduces this comment with the word, Now, to indicate that he was taking a quick pause in his narration to explain this.
The reason Judas gave the crowd a sign is because they would not necessarily be able to distinguish Jesus from the disciples without him. Jesus spent comparatively little of His ministry in Jerusalem. And the armed crowd from the priests may have only had one or two moments or fewer to ever see Him. They would not easily recognize Him, especially in the dark garden. But Judas, as one of the twelve disciples, was familiar with Jesus. He would easily know who Jesus was. Judas had lived and served with Jesus for several years.
Moreover, Judas and the priests and elders also knew His disciples were committed and fiercely loyal to their Rabbi. Consequently, they may deceptively offer themselves as Jesus in order to help Him escape. (They all swore they would die for Him—Matthew 26:35). By Judas giving them a prearranged-sign, he could identify Jesus for the priests' cohort despite what Jesus or the other disciples might say or do.
Judas likely agreed upon this sign either when he initially struck a deal with the chief priests to betray Jesus (Matthew 26:14:16) or when he met them after Jesus dismissed him from the Passover Seder (John 13:26-27, 30).
The sign Judas would use to identify and betray his Rabbi into the hands of His enemies was a customary greeting—a kiss of friendship. There is a twisted irony in using a kiss, a gesture of friendship, to betray and destroy a friend. This ironic gesture is an image of sin which is always a perversion of God's good gifts into something distorted and ugly. And Jesus seems to have picked up on this wicked irony (Luke 22:48).
Both Matthew and Mark's Gospels highlight the grotesque way Judas betrayed Jesus. The Greek word translated as "kissed" in Matthew 26:49 and Mark 14:45 is καταφιλέω (G2705—pronounced: "kat-af-ee-leh'-o"). It means to "kiss much"; to "kiss tenderly", to "kiss again and again"; or to "kiss earnestly." Their point seems to be that Judas seemed to be embellishing, even relishing, his betrayal of the Messiah.
Immediately Judas went to Jesus and said, "Hail, Rabbi!" and kissed Him (vs 49).
Matthew and Mark's Gospels record how after Judas arrived, he immediately went to Jesus, indicating that Judas acted promptly. Judas did not flinch or hesitate to betray Jesus at this decisive moment (Mark 14:45).
Judas, used an expression of honor, Hail Rabbi, to greet Jesus. The term Rabbi was a revered Hebrew term for "teacher" (John 1:38). Jewish Rabbis had followers who would devote their lives to learn from them. Jesus was Judas's and the other disciples Rabbi. But instead of following Jesus and being devoted to his Rabbi, Judas was betraying Him into the hands of men who wished to kill Him.
Judas's expression of Hail Rabbi and his choice to betray Jesus with a kiss were sinister acts that distorted their typical meaning and purpose. And they seemed unnecessarily cruel. But within a few hours of his betraying of Jesus, Judas would show remorse. He would bitterly regret His actions and attempt to undo them. But it was too late. They could not be undone. Tragically, instead of seeking God's love and forgiveness, Judas took his own life (Matthew 27:3-5).
As Judas came to Jesus to kiss Him, Jesus knew what he was going to do in advance—and He called out His disciple's wicked act of betrayal: "Judas, are you betraying the Son of Man with a kiss?" (Luke 22:48).
Judas's hollow salutation (Hail Rabbi), and kiss of betrayal brings additional meaning to Isaiah's prophecy:
"Because this people approaches Me with their words,
And honors Me with their lips,
But their heart is far away from Me."
(Isaiah 29:13)
When Judas came to Jesus, he kissed Him, signifying to the large crowd that this was in fact the man they came to arrest.
Jesus's final recorded words to Judas were of disappointment,
Friend, do what you have come for (vs 50).
It is not clear if Jesus's use of the word Friend to describe Judas was intended to be sincere or sarcastic. In either case it was ironic. Jesus's use of Friend reveals the closeness of Jesus's and Judas's relationship. Jesus regarded Judas as a friend. Judas's betrayal was personal. And the fact that His own disciple, His close friend betrayed Him, made it all the more painful for Jesus.
Recall how earlier this night, Judas and Jesus broke bread together as they ate the Passover Seder (Matthew 26:20-23). By using the term, friend, Jesus may also have been calling to mind how Judas's betrayal fulfilled the Messianic prophecy of Psalm 41,
"Even my close friend in whom I trusted,
Who ate my bread,
Has lifted up his heel against me."
(Psalm 41:9)
As soon as Judas betrayed Jesus with a kiss, the large crowd knew which man was really Jesus.
Then they came to arrest Him. Matthew wrote that they laid hands on Him and seized Him (vs 50). This seemingly matter of fact statement is actually rather jarring. Jesus, the Messiah, the Son of God was now in the hands of sinners. The victorious One was now vulnerable. The true King of Israel was in serious danger.